• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

LDSPMA

Empowering Latter-day Saints to spread light and truth by connecting them at the intersection of faith, creativity, and professional skill

  • Conference
    • Sponsors & Vendors
    • Speaker Application
    • FAQs
    • Past Conferences
      • 2024 Conference
        • Sessions
        • Workshops
        • ZIFF Networking Dinner
        • Schedule
      • 2023 Conference
        • Sessions
        • Workshops
        • Schedule
        • Sponsors & Vendors
      • 2022 Conference
        • Sessions
        • Workshops
        • Schedule and Maps
        • Photo Gallery
      • 2021 Conference
        • Sessions
        • Workshops
        • Schedule and Maps
      • 2020 Conference
        • Sessions
        • Workshops
        • Schedule
      • 2019 Conference
      • 2018 Conference
      • 2017 Conference
      • 2016 Conference
  • Membership
    • Sign Up (Free)
    • LDSPMA Next Gen (Youth)
    • University Chapters
    • Facebook Group
  • Programs
    • 2025 LDSPMA Master Classes
    • Monthly Zoom Discussions
    • Mentoring Program
  • Podcast
    • Watch
    • Listen
      • Listen on Apple Podcasts
      • Listen on Spotify
      • Listen on Google Podcasts
      • Listen on Buzzsprout
    • Submit a Creator Highlight
    • Called to Create Conversations
  • Articles
    • All Articles
    • Faith & Mindset
      • Gospel Principles
      • Creativity
      • Productivity
    • Craft Skills
      • Writing
      • Media, Film & Theater
      • Podcasting & Speaking
      • Music
      • Fine Art
    • Professional Skills
      • Editing
      • Publishing
      • Business
      • Marketing
      • Cultural Diversity
  • Awards
    • Apply to Be an Awards Judge
    • Praiseworthy Awards
      • 2024 Winners
      • 2023 Winners
      • 2022 Winners
      • 2021 Winners
      • 2020 Winners
      • 2019 Winners
      • 2018 Winners
      • 2017 Winners
      • 2016 Winners
    • Spark Awards
      • 2024 Winners
      • 2023 Winners
      • 2022 Winners
      • 2021 Winners
      • 2020 Winners
    • Lifetime Achievement Awards
  • About
    • Mission
      • LDSPMA in the Media
      • Success Stories
      • Viewpoint on LDSPMA
    • Volunteers
      • Volunteer Year-Round
      • Volunteer at the Conference
      • Apply to Be a Presenter
      • Apply to Be an Awards Judge
      • Resources for Current Volunteers
    • Leadership
    • Policies
      • Nurturing a Caring Community
      • Political Neutrality Policy
      • Antiharassment Policy
      • Harassment Reporting Form
      • Children Policy
    • Contact US
  • Support LDSPMA
    • Volunteer
    • Donate

The Art (and Professional Judgement) of Editing

January 31, 2016 By LDSPMA 1 Comment

A pencil and a piece of paper

By Devan Jensen

In editing, as in most activities, haste makes waste. The careful editor does not merely plunge into the text and flood it with corrections but instead pauses long enough to decide the quickest and easiest solution to a problem. By analyzing a problem clearly before touching pen to paper, the careful editor ultimately gets through the project faster than the person who plows blindly ahead, cutting a sentence before reading the paragraph and realizing that the sentence is necessary. In short, every correction should have a reason, and the blunderer is never as efficient as the careful editor (adapted from Grant Milnor Hyde, Newspaper Editing: A Manual for Editors, 79).

Editing is both an art and a science. The science part involves technical rules—grammar, punctuation, and so forth. As editors, we refer often to the RSC Style Guide, Church Style Guide, and Chicago Manual of Style. We have the self-discipline to go the extra mile, checking facts and figures in books and reputable Internet sites.

But editing is an art too. It takes a careful eye and a discerning mind to decide how much to change, taking into account the reading audience, the publication’s purpose, and the author’s personality.

Our authors are our customers. Let’s treat their manuscripts with respect. As editors, our goal is to revise for clarity if necessary but not to distort the main message. I have found it best to use a light touch when possible. To put it in environmental terms, tread lightly and leave a small footprint. This approach prevents introducing errors while rewriting the text and keeps authors happy (after all, the words are theirs, and their names appear at the top).

Sometimes a manuscript needs major help. If so, talk to me; then we’ll either have the author revise it or we will propose cuts in pencil.

Size up a manuscript the way a barber approaches a haircut. First, ask whether to give a light, medium, or heavy cut. Skim through the document, paying particular attention to subheads (which guide readers through the article); then begin “snipping” here and there, focusing on grammar, style, and usage while absorbing the message of the piece. Take into account the author’s expertise of language and documentation. And make sure to read the whole thing again to catch glaring problems.

Editing takes good taste and judgment. You can groom these traits, but it takes time, experience, and a ton of reading. In fact, reading widely will help you appreciate language nuances and spot tools of effective communication (bullet points, subheads, effective design, tight prose, and so on). The more you read, the more tricks you have up your sleeve. And reading leads you to question unusual spellings or factual claims that just don’t feel right. Trust those hunches. When in doubt, look it up. In the words of Obi-Wan Kenobi, “Trust your feelings.”

Your confidence as an editor will grow as you gain experience. And experience comes as you work through problems, often asking advice from your fellow editors and sometimes rethinking options to find the best solution for that unique situation.

Respect the author. Be the manuscript.

Table 1. Levels of Copyediting (Adapted from Amy Einsohn, The Copyeditor’s Handbook, 12)

 

Light

Medium

Heavy

Clarity

Fix small patches (up to several words) of ineffective prose when doing so does not impair meaning, is not needlessly nitpicky, and is fairly transparent. Otherwise, query author.

 

Point out (do not revise) large patches (sentence or more) of ineffective prose.

Request clarification

of terms likely to be unfa-miliar to target audience.

Preserve author’s voice.

Fix small patches of ineffective prose.

 

Use judgment in deciding whether to fix or query larger ineffective patches. Supply proposed revisions when possible.

Supply transitions, sub-heads, other “road signs.”

Request or supply definitions of unfamiliar terms.

Query major organizational or content problems.

Preserve author’s voice.

Rewrite any ineffective patch regardless of length if competent to do so.

 

Supply “road signs.”

Define unfamiliar terms.

Reorganize elements for optimal comprehensibility.

Use initiative, best judgment in solving problems.

Caution: Obtain supervisor and author approval before overhauling (undertaking extensive deleting, rewriting, restructuring).

Correctness

 

Correct indisputable errors in grammar, usage, and diction.

 

Fix mechanical errors.

Use judgment in deciding whether to fix, ignore, or query any locution that is not an outright error.

Query facts and statements that seem incorrect.

Correct all language and mechanical errors.

 

Verify facts and dubious statements using online or desktop sources.

Fix clear factual errors; otherwise query, proposing well-considered revisions when possible.

!Correct all language and mechanical errors.

 

Show due diligence in verifying facts and dubious statements and in revising for accuracy.

Note: Any revisions that may affect the argument should be brought to the author’s attention.

Consistency

Ensure consistency in all mechanical (e.g., spelling, capitalization, punctuation, hyphenation, abbreviations, numbers, quotations, lists, notes) and house-style matters.

Completeness

Ensure that all parts of the document are in place (cross-check and double-check everything). Refer to proofreading checklist for detailed guidance.

 

Directions: Refer to the table to edit the paragraphs as indicated.

Perform a light edit.

“Murphy’s law” insures us that no amount of proof-reading will uncover all of the errors in a work about to be published. The question we might well ask is as follows. “Just how many re-readings are reasonable”? In my personal experience I have found that two readings of galleys and two of page proofs will catch ninety nine percent of the errors. Unfortunately the remaining one per cent is often the mistakes that not only cause embarrasment, but trouble. For example, the wrong numbers for ordering merchandise or mispelled names.

Perform a medium edit.

“Murphy’s law” insures us that no amount of proof-reading will uncover all of the errors in a work about to be published. The question we might well ask is as follows. “Just how many re-readings are reasonable”? In my personal experience I have found that two readings of galleys and two of page proofs will catch ninety nine percent of the errors. Unfortunately the remaining one per cent is often the mistakes that not only cause embarrasment, but trouble. For example, the wrong numbers for ordering merchandise or mispelled names.

Perform a heavy edit.

“Murphy’s law” insures us that no amount of proof-reading will uncover all of the errors in a work about to be published. The question we might well ask is as follows. “Just how many re-readings are reasonable”? In my personal experience I have found that two readings of galleys and two of page proofs will catch ninety nine percent of the errors. Unfortunately the remaining one per cent is often the mistakes that not only cause embarrasment, but trouble. For example, the wrong numbers for ordering merchandise or mispelled names.

This exercise is adapted from Amy Einsohn, The Copyeditor’s Handbook (2000), 23.

Levels of Editing Exercise 1—Key

Light Edit

Murphy’s Law assures us that no amount of proofreading will uncover all the errors in a work about to be published. The question we might well ask is, Just how many rereadings are reasonable? In my personal experience, I have found that two readings of galleys and two of page proofs will catch 99 percent of the errors. Unfortunately, the remaining 1 percent are often the mistakes that cause not only embarrassment but trouble—for example, misspelled names or the wrong numbers for ordering merchandise. [au: Replace with “incorrect catalog numbers” for improved clarity?]

Medium Edit

No amount of proofreading will uncover all the errors in a set of proofs. The question is, [how many rereadings are reasonable]? [author: Replace bracketed text with “how much proofreading is reasonable” for directness?] I have found that two readings of galleys and two readings of page proofs will catch 99 percent of the errors. Unfortunately, the remaining mistakes are ones that can cause not only embarrassment but trouble—for example, misspelled names or incorrect catalog numbers.

Heavy Edit

No amount of proofreading will uncover all the errors in a set of proofs. Two readings of galleys and two readings of page proofs will usually catch 99 percent of the errors, but the remaining mistakes—such as incorrect phone numbers or misspelled names—often cause both embarrassment and trouble.

Photo by Jeremy Bishop on Unsplash.

Filed Under: Articles, Editing

You May Also Like

Sprint Writing for the Win

By Rebecca Talley – “There is no one-size-fits-all for writing a novel – or any book, for that matter. We all must figure out what works for us.”

To Creative Middle-Aged Sisters in the Working World

By JoLynne J. Lyon – “Decide how you’ll measure success. Study your possibilities. Say a prayer. And if it’s what you want to do, get yourself out there.”

A young woman writing.

Why You Don’t Want to Get Your Book Done Quickly

By Angela Eschler – “The quality of the book is a publisher’s best chance to convey the brand experience that will convert readers.”

Actors gather around to study their scripts.

What’s More Important: The Actor or the Show?

By Rebecca Burnham – “I don’t think it’s possible to put on a play that builds community unless you are intentional about prioritizing the people over the product.”

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Jeremy Madsen says

    June 16, 2022 at 3:32 AM

    A very helpful reminder of some high-level editing principles. Thank you!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Recent Articles

Sprint Writing for the Win

By Rebecca Talley – “There is no one-size-fits-all for writing a novel – or any book, for that matter. We all must figure out what works for us.”

To Creative Middle-Aged Sisters in the Working World

By JoLynne J. Lyon – “Decide how you’ll measure success. Study your possibilities. Say a prayer. And if it’s what you want to do, get yourself out there.”

A young woman writing.

Why You Don’t Want to Get Your Book Done Quickly

By Angela Eschler – “The quality of the book is a publisher’s best chance to convey the brand experience that will convert readers.”

Recent Podcast Episodes

Popular Articles

A senior couple walking down a quiet lane

Sometimes Things Do Work Out

By Steve Dunn Hanson – We can choose how any situation or circumstance we find ourselves in will ultimately affect us. We can literally shape the results of all our experiences.

Cussing & Creating: 3 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t (& Should!) Use Profanities in Your Writing

By Lizzy Pingry – Writers must evaluate the way they express themselves: how does our use of language and its profanities build or destroy our stories? 

Portrait of a Painter: The Journey of Latter-day Saint Artist Dan Wilson

By Howard Collett – “God is in the very details of our work. That doesn’t just apply to Christian artists working on temple paintings, but it applies to anyone in any career. God can answer specific questions to help us be better providers, better employees, better employers, better husbands or wives, or wherever we need help.” – Artist, Dan Wilson

More Articles

Headshot of Bonnie Oscarson

A Conversation with Bonnie Oscarson

If we shift our focus to creating a meaningful life and allow the Lord to guide our experiences, we will be prepared for the future He has in store.

Aaron Merrell: Working in the Film Industry

By Trina Boice – Check out a recent BYU-Idaho Forum presentation, featuring Aaron Merrell, who is a senior producer for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saint’s Publishing Services Department. In the forum, Aaron gives a behind-the-scenes look into producing the Book of Mormon Videos series. He also shares insights about working in the film industry.

Headshot of author J. Scott Savage.

A Conversation with J. Scott Savage

By J. Scott Savage – “Magnifying your calling doesn’t guarantee you’re going to make a lot of money or be famous, but it does guarantee that you’re taking those talents and you’re doing something with them.”

Footer

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube

Copyright © 2025 LDSPMA. All Rights Reserved. LDSPMA is not endorsed by nor affiliated with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.